Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Your Mom loves your mixes, but are they really up to scratch? Post your tracks here and get the community's feedback to help with the spit and polish. Impress us! We don't bite.
Post Reply
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Been fucking about with this since finishing work.

Don't know if Amy Winehouse was big in the US. She was massive in the UK doing modern soul singing. She has this boyfriend that was a right cunt and she ended up drinking and smacking herself to death about 10 years ago.

If you're not familiar with the original, have a listen to this first:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJAfLE39ZZ8

And, here's mine:
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by Greg_L »

Lol. Yes we know who the fuck Amy Winehouse is in the USA.

I'll listen later.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2017 5:11 pm Lol. Yes we know who the fuck Amy Winehouse is in the USA.

I'll listen later.
haha, well you never know! Some people I think are really popular and they just never made it over there.
User avatar
rayc
Posts: 8948
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 6:31 pm
Location: South of Bundaberg North of Brisbane

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by rayc »

I doubt that Amy would be unhappy with your version.
I think the hard panned guitars are a little loud.
The guitar on the Left sounded a little fizzy in the chorus.
Other than that - I think it's a cool cover.
Cheers
rayc
User avatar
paulman
Posts: 757
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 7:53 pm
Location: Jacksonville, FL

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by paulman »

I'm gonna be honest, it's been a long day at work and I'm not getting off the fucking couch to plug in to my monitors. I'll do that later or tomorrow and get a better listen. But just on my laptop, it sounds like the vocals need to be louder. Good sound overall, though. And yeah, Amy was huge here too. :-)
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Cheers guys... My iPad is telling me that I read these comments last night.. But I have no memory of it at all
User avatar
ido1957
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:45 pm
Location: Edmonton. Alberta

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by ido1957 »

Yep - vocals need to come up a bit. The leads used to accent a couple of parts could be a tiny bit louder just so they poke out a bit. I think I hear them but it's kinda mushed in with the rhythm. Rhythms are great, drums suit the track, bass good overall a nice even level and arrangement. Very little needed to finish this one :)
People want something for nothing, they want it right now. Either they can't tell quality or don't care but feel it is important that everyone agrees with them.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by Greg_L »

I agree with Ido. I think it's pretty close to being pretty good. The vocals are the real problem on this one. They're low, unintelligible, drowning in a wash of too many guitars that sound too similar. If you're gonna have guitars dancing all over the place, I suggest you put more work into getting different tones out of your rig. Too much of the same sound is a problem. Since guitars and vocals sort of occupy the same space, getting better separation from the guitars can help the vocals.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:01 pm I agree with Ido. I think it's pretty close to being pretty good. The vocals are the real problem on this one. They're low, unintelligible, drowning in a wash of too many guitars that sound too similar. If you're gonna have guitars dancing all over the place, I suggest you put more work into getting different tones out of your rig. Too much of the same sound is a problem. Since guitars and vocals sort of occupy the same space, getting better separation from the guitars can help the vocals.
ido1957 wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:35 am Yep - vocals need to come up a bit. The leads used to accent a couple of parts could be a tiny bit louder just so they poke out a bit. I think I hear them but it's kinda mushed in with the rhythm. Rhythms are great, drums suit the track, bass good overall a nice even level and arrangement. Very little needed to finish this one :)
Cheers guys, I totally get what you're saying about the guitars all sounding similar - this one really didn't take long - I just dialed in a tone, and played all of the parts straight off. The leads are probably all adlibbed.

Yeah, I really need to work on how to get vocals to sit properly in a mix - I was gonna work on it today but I've been away surfing so I'll install that thing rami suggested and try a few different ways to get vocals to sit better, both in this one and my other songs.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Cock - just opened up my computer, reaper has crashed and I hadn't saved this project. I've still got all the music, but none of the vocals are there. I do have them on a memory stick but I'll have to re-import them and remix the whole thing. (I record vocals upstairs in my wifes office on a laptop)
User avatar
miroslav
Posts: 1819
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:30 pm

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by miroslav »

Greg_L wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:01 pm I agree with Ido. I think it's pretty close to being pretty good. The vocals are the real problem on this one.
I agree with both of them.
It COULD sound really good...but you need to put some more work into it.
Unclutter it and get your tones and levels better balanced.

Maybe you should also adjust the vocals and sing it from the guy's perspective.
You know..."kept MY dick wet" instead of "kept HIS dick wet"...
...just saying. :)
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

miroslav wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:25 pm
Greg_L wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 12:01 pm I agree with Ido. I think it's pretty close to being pretty good. The vocals are the real problem on this one.
I agree with both of them.
It COULD sound really good...but you need to put some more work into it.
Unclutter it and get your tones and levels better balanced.

Maybe you should also adjust the vocals and sing it from the guy's perspective.
You know..."kept MY dick wet" instead of "kept HIS dick wet"...
...just saying. :)
Yeah, I think I need to work on the guitar sound a bit... which shouldn't be too difficult as it has a very thrown together on one guitar with one sound feel at the moment. I've remixed the vocal tracks now after my file saving fuckup and I think they sound better than before.

I thought about altering the lyrics slightly to make them more male.. but they're just not as good reversed. I tried I left no time - kept my dick wet - kept her cunt wet. But the original lyrics are better even if it sounds a bit strange with a bloke singing them.
User avatar
miroslav
Posts: 1819
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:30 pm

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by miroslav »

JD01 wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2017 5:07 pm But the original lyrics are better even if it sounds a bit strange with a bloke singing them.
Hey...you're the one singing 'em. :P
User avatar
Bubba
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:45 pm
Location: Checking out my haggard face in the mirror.

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by Bubba »

I don't know why you keep moaning that your voice is no good - it's fine on this! An odd choice for a cover, but I like what you did with it! :biggrin:
Haggard Musician :mad:
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Bubba wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2017 9:37 am I don't know why you keep moaning that your voice is no good - it's fine on this! An odd choice for a cover, but I like what you did with it! :biggrin:
Cos it sounds like a sack of arseholes! Gonna see if I can quickly retrack one of the rhythms now.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

Anyway, here's the version with the remixed vocals (after I lost the previous mix) one of the rhythms re-tracked based on the tones that we were discussing in the tone thread last weekend.

User avatar
miroslav
Posts: 1819
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 3:30 pm

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by miroslav »

Better...better.

I think there's still a guitar up the middle that fights the vocal...or at least it seems that way to my (I'm on a small computer speaker bar at the moment).

I also find that you have a lot of mid-high "hash" in the guitars, and that too is fighting with the vocal (not sure if it's the amount of distortion or the tone of the distortion, or both)....and because you're singing it in a pretty low register (is this the same key as the original?), your voice gets masked byt the guitars. I think if you push it up to a higher key, your voice would stand out and on top more...but that depends on what you are comfy with.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

miroslav wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:34 pm Better...better.

I think there's still a guitar up the middle that fights the vocal...or at least it seems that way to my (I'm on a small computer speaker bar at the moment).

I also find that you have a lot of mid-high "hash" in the guitars, and that too is fighting with the vocal (not sure if it's the amount of distortion or the tone of the distortion, or both)....and because you're singing it in a pretty low register (is this the same key as the original?), your voice gets masked byt the guitars. I think if you push it up to a higher key, your voice would stand out and on top more...but that depends on what you are comfy with.
Cheers, Miro - if there's frequencies clashing with eachother I'd never know what they'd be or how to sort it out. I haven't re-tracked the little lead licks throughout the verses - maybe I should.

It is in the same key as the original - I have a pretty limited range though - I sing the chorus is an octave higher (probably where Wineo sings the verse) and its close to the limit and I have to scream to get there. It would be shit if I screamed the whole thing.
User avatar
rammer24
Posts: 2736
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:41 pm

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by rammer24 »

miroslav wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:34 pm is this the same key as the original?)
Yes and no (He posted the original in the OP) . It's the same key, but he's singing it an octave lower, which makes it hard to sink your teeth into. She also does it with a shuffle timing, and JD is doing it in straight 4/4/ timing, with a Greg-type floor riding thing. :D

I like when someone makes a song their own, like this one. The vocal level is better, but I'd still bring them up. When you start playing some lead while you're still singing, it masks the vocals. Snare is a little carboard-y. Not sure what you can do to give it more snap. It's not bad, but it can be better. The snare, I mean.

To be honest, I know you have more talent than this song shows. It almost seems like you did what I've done often in the past. In my haste to finish a song, I have sometimes not given it the love it deserves. Sometimes it's good to just leave it alone, listen to it first thing in the morning the next day, and many things will pop out as being very obvious to you. Sometimes we're too far inside the painting to see the whole picture.
Last edited by rammer24 on Sun Jan 22, 2017 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Back to Black - Amy Winehouse Cover

Post by JD01 »

rammer24 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:59 pm
miroslav wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2017 4:34 pm is this the same key as the original?)
Yes and no (He posted the original in the OP) . It's the same key, but he's singing it an octave lower, which makes it hard to sink your teeth into. She also does it with a shuffle timing, and JD is doing it in straight 4/4/ timing, with a Greg-type floor riding thing.

I like when someone makes a song their own, like this one. The vocal level is better, but I'd still bring them up. When you start playing some lead while you're still singing, it masks the vocals. Snare is a little carboard-y. Not sure what you can do to give it more snap. It's not bad, but it can be better. The snare, I mean. To be honest, I know you have more talent than this song shows. It almost seems like you did what I've done often in the past. In my haste to finish a song, I sometimes not given it the love it deserves. Sometimes it's good to just leave it alone, listen to it first thing in the morning the next day, and many things will pop out as being very obvious to you. Sometimes we're too far inside the painting to see the whole picture.
Yeah, I have no intention of ever doing a soul song!

I've only retracked one of the guitars and it's an improvement. I should probably retrack them all to just generally make a better job of it. I kinda like a dry cracking snare sound but i might make a couple of adjustments to the compression on the snare to open it up a little.
Post Reply