Got Yourself

Your Mom loves your mixes, but are they really up to scratch? Post your tracks here and get the community's feedback to help with the spit and polish. Impress us! We don't bite.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Greg_L »

Now that I can hear her vocals, they're pretty bad. Sorry. She sings like she's bored. Flat, emotionless, boring bored girl vocals with no energy. She needs to listen to some Runaways.

The drums are a little dominant in this mix. You had the guitars killing everything before, now I think you dropped em too much. And to me you're still fighting to find the meat in the guitars. These guitars sound small to me. Maybe you're so concerned with low end muck and boxiness that you trimmed too much fat out of it. And I agree with Bubba, you got all kinds of lead chops, but they sound sterile and mechanical. There's no danger or energy in the guitars or the vocals. This is supposed to rock, right? I'm not getting much excitement from the mix or the performances. Sorry if I'm being too blunt. I just know you care and want to improve. Ramping up the energy in pretty much everything will help.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Hmmmm, bugger.

I'll give it some more thought in the morning

Not sure what to do with this now really, probably just bring the guitars up by a db or two and leave it there, unless I re-track the leads there's not a lot else to do. The leads (aside from the intro) were the only bits that weren't re-tracked from the first attempt at this when it had the really long intro.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Here's mix 5 incase you're interested.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Bubba
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:45 pm
Location: Checking out my haggard face in the mirror.

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Bubba »

Greg_L wrote: Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:56 pm Now that I can hear her vocals, they're pretty bad. Sorry. She sings like she's bored. Flat, emotionless, boring bored girl vocals with no energy. She needs to listen to some Runaways.
Oh, I don't know. I like it. It's a British Indie female voice - lots of bands over here have gone with that style and I generally like 'em.

Primitives, Belle and Sebastian, Camera Obscura, Propaganda - all bands I expect you've never heard of and wouldn't like if you did, but they're fairly popular over here.
Last edited by Bubba on Fri Mar 03, 2017 5:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Haggard Musician :mad:
User avatar
Bubba
Posts: 3350
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 2:45 pm
Location: Checking out my haggard face in the mirror.

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Bubba »

JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:42 am Here's mix 5 incase you're interested.
It's good - I think her voice needs sinking into a little ambience, to be honest - kind of like the chorus, which really sits well. My earlier comments were a bit harsh, sorry mate.

And it's still an amazing song - I wouldn't mind a go at mixing it.
Haggard Musician :mad:
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Bubba wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 5:18 am
JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:42 am Here's mix 5 incase you're interested.
It's good - I think her voice needs sinking into a little ambience, to be honest - kind of like the chorus, which really sits well. My earlier comments were a bit harsh, sorry mate.

And it's still an amazing song - I wouldn't mind a go at mixing it.
I tried a bit of delay on the verse vocal but didn't really like it so I just added a bit more verb. I liked the change to delay when it finally gets to the chorus. Maybe I'll try something else.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Greg_L »

Bubba wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 5:15 am

Oh, I don't know. I like it. It's a British Indie female voice - lots of bands over here have gone with that style and I generally like 'em.

Primitives, Belle and Sebastian, Camera Obscura, Propaganda - all bands I expect you've never heard of and wouldn't like if you did, but they're fairly popular over here.
Yeah I get that. I like the frail feminine "indie" female voice too sometimes. I'm just not hearing it on this tune. I know JD loves him some Kurt Cobain, so I just think he needs someone that sings like Kurt's horrid wife on this one.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Greg_L »

JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:42 am Here's mix 5 incase you're interested.
I think this one's better. Seems more balanced. Much more pleasing than the last one for whatever reason. Maybe my morning ears are more forgiving than my afternoon ears.

One thing that struck me on every listen is that the song is too long. You could just end this thing at roughly 3:10 after the big chorus build up section. That's where, in my mind's ear's mind's eye, I want the song to end. I hear everything building up to 3:10 and I feel like it should end there and I'd be satisfied. I'd heard all there is to hear. But no, here comes another almost two minutes of the same thing. That's just how I hear it with punk rock ears. 2-3 minutes and get the fuck out.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 7:27 am Yeah I get that. I like the frail feminine "indie" female voice too sometimes. I'm just not hearing it on this tune. I know JD loves him some Kurt Cobain, so I just think he needs someone that sings like Kurt's horrid wife on this one.
TO be fair to the smack addled botox clown, she did sound pretty good in the right context. I'd like to stick my own vocals on it, but I have absolutely zero vocal or lyrical ideas for this one as yet.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 8:13 am
JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:42 am Here's mix 5 incase you're interested.
I think this one's better. Seems more balanced. Much more pleasing than the last one for whatever reason. Maybe my morning ears are more forgiving than my afternoon ears.

One thing that struck me on every listen is that the song is too long. You could just end this thing at roughly 3:10 after the big chorus build up section. That's where, in my mind's ear's mind's eye, I want the song to end. I hear everything building up to 3:10 and I feel like it should end there and I'd be satisfied. I'd heard all there is to hear. But no, here comes another almost two minutes of the same thing. That's just how I hear it with punk rock ears. 2-3 minutes and get the fuck out.
Dunno - I've not done much too it - just a little reverb adjustment and bringing the guitars back in a bit - not too much though. Maybe you just haven't had time to get a grump on yet today!

Yeah - it is the same, I take two attempts and a guitar break to build up to the chorus and then finally get back to the 2nd verse, 2nd prechorus and final chorus. Might be worth swapping around the 2nd verse and guitar break; I don't mind 5 minute songs though, although most of my other stuff is shorter.
User avatar
Greg_L
Posts: 21453
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:07 pm
Location: Where the knuckle meets the poophole

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Greg_L »

JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 8:28 am
Dunno - I've not done much too it - just a little reverb adjustment and bringing the guitars back in a bit - not too much though. Maybe you just haven't had time to get a grump on yet today!
Bringing the guitars back in balanced it out better. And they don't seem as small and weak anymore.
Yeah - it is the same, I take two attempts and a guitar break to build up to the chorus and then finally get back to the 2nd verse, 2nd prechorus and final chorus. Might be worth swapping around the 2nd verse and guitar break; I don't mind 5 minute songs though, although most of my other stuff is shorter.
That's fine and all. A 5 minute song is great if it's 5 interesting minutes. This song is just 2:30 of actual song done twice. It's your song, you can make it however you want. I'm just saying my internal clock ran out at 3:10 and the song totally lends itself to ending right there.
Rebel Yell
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Greg_L wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 8:34 am That's fine and all. A 5 minute song is great if it's 5 interesting minutes. This song is just 2:30 of actual song done twice. It's your song, you can make it however you want. I'm just saying my internal clock ran out at 3:10 and the song totally lends itself to ending right there.
Yeah, there needs to be more interesting stuff going on in that 2nd verse and chorus so its not just a repeat - significant changes to the vocal melody/harmonies or something.

I'll keep that in mind if/when I get around to my own vocal version of this.
User avatar
Armistice
Posts: 11573
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:06 pm
Location: Orstralia

Re: Got Yourself

Post by Armistice »

First listen (mix 5) - late at night because I'm up testing and on my laptop speakers so can't really get any sonic detail - but the singing isn't winning me JD, I'm afraid. Thought she sounded a bit flat in places and a bit whiny and all a bit same same in terms of the vocal melody. And it just appears to be sitting on top of the music a bit.

I'll come back in the morning when I go home and have proper gear to listen on and see how it sounds for real. :coolstorybro:
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

Armistice wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 9:31 am First listen (mix 5) - late at night because I'm up testing and on my laptop speakers so can't really get any sonic detail - but the singing isn't winning me JD, I'm afraid. Thought she sounded a bit flat in places and a bit whiny and all a bit same same in terms of the vocal melody. And it just appears to be sitting on top of the music a bit.

I'll come back in the morning when I go home and have proper gear to listen on and see how it sounds for real. :coolstorybro:
Cheers, mate.
User avatar
ido1957
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:45 pm
Location: Edmonton. Alberta

Re: Got Yourself

Post by ido1957 »

Mix 5 :coolstorybro:

Do you have any vocal tuning software? If not, I wouldn't mind trying to tune the girl's vocals on your tune. I find it a challenge to try to disguise it /make it as unnoticeable as humanly possible. If you're interested, PM me a link to a download site like Google Play/Dropbox whatever.

I'll take all the tracks you have going in this tune as they are all interconnected (lead/backups). And I need a no-vocal backing track so I can tune it to match the music.

One caveat - may take me a few days as work is busy for the next 4 days but by Wednesday I should be free to spend a few hours on it.
People want something for nothing, they want it right now. Either they can't tell quality or don't care but feel it is important that everyone agrees with them.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

ido1957 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:24 am Mix 5 :coolstorybro:

Do you have any vocal tuning software? If not, I wouldn't mind trying to tune the girl's vocals on your tune. I find it a challenge to try to disguise it /make it as unnoticeable as humanly possible. If you're interested, PM me a link to a download site like Google Play/Dropbox whatever.

I'll take all the tracks you have going in this tune as they are all interconnected (lead/backups). And I need a no-vocal backing track so I can tune it to match the music.

One caveat - may take me a few days as work is busy for the next 4 days but by Wednesday I should be free to spend a few hours on it.
Cheers, Ido. I'll take a look later on. I'll render some .wavs with nothing on them at all and take off my shit attempts at tuning. I wish she'd get herself some decent gear so she could do things over more easily.
User avatar
rammer24
Posts: 2736
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:41 pm

Re: Got Yourself

Post by rammer24 »

Mix 5.....

I don't mind her "attitude" and sound, but her pitch needs help. I think putting her on pitch will legitimize her style a little more.

Snare is a little box-y and/or maybe too loud. Also, check the parts where you do a double snare hit (like at 1:25). It seems there's a bass drum hitting at the same time as the snare which makes it pop out in a weird way. There are a few other places where that happens. I think pretty much every time that "B" part occurs. I'd simply remove the bass drum hit that's there.

It's a pretty good mix, she's just a little pitchy. The song itself reminds me of Pat Benatar slightly.
User avatar
JD01
Posts: 16510
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:11 pm
Location: Wales, UK

Re: Got Yourself

Post by JD01 »

rammer24 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:45 am Mix 5.....

I don't mind her "attitude" and sound, but her pitch needs help. I think putting her on pitch will legitimize her style a little more.

Snare is a little box-y and/or maybe too loud. Also, check the parts where you do a double snare hit (like at 1:25). It seems there's a bass drum hitting at the same time as the snare which makes it pop out in a weird way. There are a few other palces where that happens. I think pretty much every time that "B" part occurs. I'd simply remove the bass drum hit that's there.

It's a pretty good mix, she's just a little pitchy. The song itself reminds me of Pat Benatar slightly.
Cheers, I'll look into those snare/kick hits - I don't think the kick is hitting at the same time though - maybe the snares are just too close to eachother, might move them apart by a few more ms.
User avatar
rammer24
Posts: 2736
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:41 pm

Re: Got Yourself

Post by rammer24 »

Oh maybe. In that case, there shouldn't be 2 snares so close to each other that they flam. There should be a hi-hat playing there, so it should just be 2 single snare hits an 8th note apart.
User avatar
ido1957
Posts: 932
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 7:45 pm
Location: Edmonton. Alberta

Re: Got Yourself

Post by ido1957 »

JD01 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:39 am
ido1957 wrote: Fri Mar 03, 2017 10:24 am Mix 5 :coolstorybro:

Do you have any vocal tuning software? If not, I wouldn't mind trying to tune the girl's vocals on your tune. I find it a challenge to try to disguise it /make it as unnoticeable as humanly possible. If you're interested, PM me a link to a download site like Google Play/Dropbox whatever.

I'll take all the tracks you have going in this tune as they are all interconnected (lead/backups). And I need a no-vocal backing track so I can tune it to match the music.

One caveat - may take me a few days as work is busy for the next 4 days but by Wednesday I should be free to spend a few hours on it.
Cheers, Ido. I'll take a look later on. I'll render some .wavs with nothing on them at all and take off my shit attempts at tuning. I wish she'd get herself some decent gear so she could do things over more easily.
Well, I just found out my weekend is clear after all, but Monday-Wednesday will be a friggen nightmare. So I can work on it this weekend if you get a chance to dig out the files. 24 bit/44100 WAVs if possible to keep res as high as possible? :)
People want something for nothing, they want it right now. Either they can't tell quality or don't care but feel it is important that everyone agrees with them.
Post Reply